Kriangkrai' stops 'Nantana' from proposing an urgent motion on the issue of the behavior of 'Constitutional Court judges' entering the Senate meeting, indicating whether it is an ethical violation or not, indicating that a letter must be sent to the Senate President to consider granting permission first.The Senate meeting, chaired by First Vice President of the Senate, General Kriangkrai Srirak, at the beginning of the meeting, Ms. Nantana Nanthawaropas, Senator, stood up to propose an urgent oral motion for the Senate meeting to discuss the behavior of a Constitutional Court judge who was found to have publicly criticized, which may be considered a violation of ethical standards.Before Ms. Nantana could explain the reasons and ask for the motion certifier, General Kriangkrai informed her that he did not allow the urgent motion to be proposed to the meeting without sending a letter to inform the Senate President of the details. He cited Section 40 of the Senate Regulations, which states that urgent motio ns do not need to be proposed in advance, such as urgent consultation requests. However, in a Senate meeting, the Senate President has the duty to maintain peace and order. Therefore, in all motions proposed according to the regulations, the Senate President must be informed of the information and consider whether or not to propose them. Only then will the motion proposer be able to propose them.This caused Ms. Nantana to argue that she was about to inform the details and the urgent motion to be proposed had supporters. She asked to listen to the principles and reasons first and should listen to the end. Gen. Kriangkrai insisted that it could not be done, but the argument was not over, causing Mr. Sitthikorn Thongyot, Senator, to protest the decision because it was not included in the Senate agenda. He asked the president to control the meeting. If he was not decisive, he thought that the next case would be difficult to meet.While Gen. Kriangkrai told Ms. Nantana that he did not allow it and had to write a letter to the Senate President before discussing it in the meeting so that the Senate President could make a decision first and asked to write a letter in advance, which he did not allow at this time. Then he proceeded to the next agenda item.Source: Thai News Agency
Break “Nantana” proposes urgent motion on the issue of “Constitutional Court judges'” behavior

Recent Posts
Taiwan High Speed Rail Faces Overcrowding During Mid-Autumn Festival Travel
September 27, 2026
Japanese University Students Highlight Taiwanese Tea at Tokyo Expo
September 27, 2026
Taiwan to Experience Changing Weather Patterns Starting Thursday
September 27, 2026
U.S. Taiwan Policy Remains Unchanged After Trump-Xi Summit
September 27, 2026
Taiwan’s Foreign Minister Embarks on Diplomatic Mission to Central America
September 27, 2026
Taiwan Secures Silver Medals in Kurash and Weightlifting at Asian Games
September 27, 2026
Taiwan Towel Incident Sparks Controversy at Asian Games
September 27, 2026
Taiwan Secures Bronze in Asian Games Baseball with Win Over China
September 27, 2026
Taiwan’s Fu Chao-hsuan Wins Gold in Men’s High Jump at Asian Games
September 27, 2026
Fu Chao-hsuan Wins Gold in High Jump at Asian Games
September 27, 2026
Trump and Xi Remain Silent on Taiwan Discussion During White House Meeting
September 25, 2026