Bangkok, July 8th - Former Speaker of the House of Representatives "Chuan" defends "Sirikanya", the wrong knot, swears by MPs, points out that "person" clarifies that it is fact-correct, expecting the new MPs to say according to the message received Completely mentioned is considered complete.

Mr. Chuan Leekpai, Member of Parliament and former leader of the Democratic Party Mentioning the case of Mr. Srisuwan Janya, the leader of the Patriotic Organization Submit a petition to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to examine the ethics of the pledge of duty as an MP. On July 4, the past said that in making this vow unusual Normally, taking the oath is considered an important condition according to the provisions of the Constitution before the performance of duties by members of the House of Representatives (Members). Each person's last name is followed. The principles of practice have to wait for the President of the Council. Bring the statement to take the oath of allegiance. All MPs at the meeting must say the statement given by the Speaker of the Council. prefaced every sentence, every message, but it appeared that on that day when the Chairman preceded the oath of allegiance as "I" and MPs Everyone then said their first and last name. did not wait for the president preaching the message of the oath of allegiance but instead spoke according to the message of the vow at the same time The main reason is because on the table in front of the seat of All MPs in the House of Commons There is a piece of paper that writes the oath of allegiance to the MPs. All MPs at the meeting MPs who are new members, all read accordingly. As for those who are former MPs who are accustomed to saying that according to the president's preamble at the meeting, they all say the same until the end of the swearing-in message. The Chairman did not have time to introduce the oath of allegiance to the meeting. This is an actual fact. The old man who was accustomed to obeying the preamble of the chairman in the meeting therefore followed all of them until the end of the oath of allegiance. The Chairman did not have time to introduce the oath of allegiance to the meeting. This is an actual fact. The old man who was accustomed to obeying the preamble of the chairman in the meeting therefore followed all of them until the end of the oath of allegiance. The Chairman did not have time to introduce the oath of allegiance to the meeting. This is an actual fact.

Therefore, Mr. Srisuwan went to request the NACC to investigate. Ms. Sirikanya by taking the picture clip as evidence, and Ms. Sirikanya clarified that wrong queue Because according to the time process MPs will take an oath According to the regulations, it is stated that The chairman of the council must is the lead speaker and MPs must speak according to that paragraph This is true. and is a correct practice Everyone has to wait for the chairman to speak first and then the members of the meeting must speak accordingly.

“When I served as chairman of the council Everyone must be like this, but this trip, new members may be confused. and when he saw the vows on the table in front of everyone So he read it all until the end, but it's okay, it's considered complete even though it didn't say the vow according to the president. because when the words of one's oath are fully pronounced It is considered complete and complete.” Former Speaker of the Council Said.-Thai News Agency

Source: Thai News Agency