Responding to the wife of a big police officer, she is not telling the truth and is ready to fight. If she sues, she will sue back.

The victim of the case of the wife of a big police officer who stole her dowry confirmed that the relationship between her husband and the other party was true in every way and there is a clip to confirm it.The wife of a big police officer confirmed that she had suspected the two of them for some time because she had secretly watched the chat conversations between them, which led to the installation of a hidden camera. Then, on May 8, the two of them met at a house in Khlong 7 and had an affair. Then, on June 6, the other party asked to meet her again, claiming that he was going to get something from the condo. But when asked again, the other party said that he wanted to rekindle the relationship. Her husband did not want to play along. However, the other party did not want to end it and called her husband on August 16, which she answered. Therefore, they cleared up the issue of the relationship. The other party denied that they had such a relationship. The reason she still allowed her husband to contact h er was because she felt sorry for him and saw that her husband was having problems at that time.As for the other party's husband, I tried to contact him both by letter and SMS. The content I sent was telling the whole story of what happened and demanding the money and gold back. As for the video clip of their relationship, I kept it in a safe place. I didn't send it to anyone, including the police. I haven't filed a lawsuit against the adulterer yet. In the clip, there is also the moment when the other party stole the key card. I will give this to the police. As for the relationship between me and the other party, I confirm that they didn't know each other before. I only got to know them when I started to suspect that they were having an affair with my husband.As for the issue of the missing 120 baht of gold and cash, she confirmed that it was real and that she had kept them together in a bag in a drawer in her bedroom, along with 3 guns. The guns were not missing, but the belongings were missing. However , there was a bag belonging to the other party that contained gold sales papers and an insurance policy with the other party's name on it, which was placed inside the room. As for the matter of the other party stealing her dowry, she personally did not think that the other party had no money, but rather that it was a way to cancel the wedding. As for the condo rental, which the other party claimed that her husband had asked the other party for help renting a condo for 10,000 baht per month, she confirmed that it was not true.As for the rainbow bag that the other party claimed to have a branded bag in, it was confirmed that it was indeed found in the room, but at first it was not opened. However, when it was discovered that the relationship between the two was true, it was decided to open it and saw that it was something else as previously reported in the news, and that the branded bag was not found. This matter has already been fully reported to the police.As for the issue of possibly investigating her hu sband for inappropriate behavior, I have already talked to her husband and he said he accepts it because the matter has come to this point, so he accepts what is happening. Regarding her fraud case, the court has dismissed 2 cases, 2 are still under consideration, and 1 has been mediated, making a total of 5 cases.On the issue of being a special lecturer, I graduated with a degree in Business Administration, majoring in Marketing Management, so I became a special lecturer, giving knowledge to students in the police force that if income from a profession is not enough, there must be some way to earn money. It is a sharing from my own experience, regarding wearing a police officer uniform. The victim explained that it was a fairway night event of the university, giving people to dress in their dream profession.As for the issue of the lawsuit, after this, there will be another consultation with the husband about which additional issues to sue. As for the wife of the former big police officer, she will sue ba ck, but she personally does not care and is ready to fight openly. As for the husband's mistake, she is ready to forgive him. It is expected that the marriage will continue. Finally, she would like to tell the other party to return the things. Being an adulterer with someone else's husband should have a sense of right and wrong and should have more morality because her own actions will make her life miserable.Source: Thai News Agency